Most important lesson of drone & missile warfare is economic
AI Analysis
This article argues that the primary lesson from recent conflicts (Ukraine, Gaza, Iran) is the economic unsustainability of countering drones and missiles with solely active defense systems. It highlights the cost disparity between cheap drones/missiles and expensive interceptors, advocating for a greater focus on passive defense measures. The author specifically addresses the need for India to shift its defense preparedness towards survivability alongside offensive capabilities.
Key Takeaways
- Drones are causing a significant portion (80%) of casualties in the Ukraine War.
- Active counter-measures (missiles, guns, lasers) are becoming economically unsustainable against mass drone/missile attacks.
- Passive defense measures (camouflage, dispersion, hardening) are proving effective in recent conflicts.
- India's traditional focus on offensive capability needs to be balanced with a greater emphasis on survivability.
- Tactical drones cost $300-500, while strategic drones cost $20,000-50,000, making interception costly.
Why It Matters
The increasing prevalence of low-cost drones and precision missiles is fundamentally changing the calculus of modern warfare. A reliance on expensive active defense systems is likely to be economically crippling in a large-scale conflict, necessitating investment in passive defenses and potentially altering military doctrine. This is particularly relevant for India, given its potential conflicts with Pakistan and China.
Most important lesson of drone & missile warfare is economic
ThePrint On Camera
Society & Culture
Science
Events
More
Search
Add ThePrint as a trusted source✕
Friday, June 5, 2026
ThePrint On Camera
Society & Culture
Science
Events
More
Search
Home Opinion The most important lesson of drone and missile warfare in Iran &...
The most important lesson of drone and missile warfare in Iran & Ukraine is economic
India’s defence preparedness has traditionally prioritised offensive capability over survivability. Drone and missile warfare demand a correction.
Lt Gen H S Panag (retd)
04 June, 2026 11:06 am IST
A drone test-firing a ULPGM-V3 in the National Open Area Range, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh | X/@TheMinuend
Follow Us :
Text Size: A- A+
On the transparent battlefield, cheap drones and precision missiles are changing warfare faster than militaries can adapt. Drones cause 80 per cent of the personnel and weapon platform casualties in the Ukraine War, and missiles are crippling airbases, command centres, ammunition depots and energy infrastructure deep behind the frontline. Traditional air defence kinetic and electronic counter-measures are cost-prohibitive, particularly against much cheaper drones costing around $300-500 for the tactical drones and $20,000-50,000 for strategic drones.
While equally cheap fighter drones are redressing the balance against drones, there is no alternative to expensive air defence platforms against air and missile attacks. Consequently, long neglected passive counter air, missile, and drone counter measures have made an innovative comeback in Gaza, Lebanon, Ukraine and Iran wars.
Ideally, a judicious mix of both active and passive counter-measures is required, but Gaza and Iran have proved that survival against a superior adversary can be ensured with passive counter-measures.
Show Full Article
Lessons for the Indian military
For the Indian Armed Forces, the lesson is stark. The next conflict with Pakistan or China will witness mass employment of drones, loitering munitions, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles across the tactical, operational and strategic spectrum. Frontline defences, artillery gun areas, ammunition dumps, fuel installations, bridges, railheads, airbases and logistics nodes will all come under persistent surveillance and attack. Transparency of the battlefield and the entire strategic depth compounds the vulnerability.
India is rightly focusing on active counter-measures such as air defence missiles/guns, fighter drones, jammers and lasers. But active systems alone cannot cope with large-scale drone and missile warfare. The economics are unsustainable. A drone costing Rs 50,000 cannot be countered repeatedly with interceptor missiles costing several lakhs or crores. Even advanced air defence systems struggle against saturation attacks involving drone swarms, decoys and simultaneous missile salvos.
The answer lies equally in passive defence — low-cost survivability me