Fences Not F-35s: Drone Attacks and the Illogic of Gulf Procurement
AI Analysis
The article argues that Gulf states' current air defense procurement strategies, focused on expensive systems like Patriot and THAAD, are unsustainable due to high ammunition consumption and limited replenishment capabilities. It highlights the effectiveness of lower-tech, cheaper counter-drone systems like the Gepard anti-aircraft gun and even drone-on-drone interception methods. The author advocates for a shift towards a procurement mindset prioritizing 'local relevance' and logistical realities over chasing the latest high-tech solutions.
Key Takeaways
- The Gepard 35mm anti-aircraft gun is highly effective against Shahed-type drones in Ukraine, costing only a few thousand dollars per engagement.
- Iran's drone and missile attacks are depleting Gulf states' stockpiles of interceptor missiles faster than they can be replenished.
- The US defense-industrial base can manage replenishment, but Gulf states face significant challenges, especially with US and Israeli needs prioritized.
- Expensive, advanced air defense systems are strategically unsustainable due to ammunition costs and supply limitations.
- A shift in procurement is needed, focusing on threats specific to the Gulf region and logistical feasibility rather than mirroring US force planning.
Why It Matters
This analysis suggests a critical flaw in current Gulf defense strategies, highlighting the need to adapt to the evolving threat of low-cost, high-volume drone attacks. The unsustainable reliance on expensive interceptors creates a vulnerability that adversaries can exploit, potentially undermining regional stability. A shift towards more cost-effective and logistically viable counter-drone solutions is crucial for long-term security.
Fences Not F-35s: Drone Attacks and the Illogic of Gulf Procurement
When the world's at stake, go beyond the headlines.
National security. For insiders. By insiders.
National security. For insiders. By insiders.
Join War on the Rocks and gain access to content trusted by policymakers, military leaders, and strategic thinkers worldwide.
Fences Not F-35s: Drone Attacks and the Illogic of Gulf Procurement
June 1, 2026
Fences Not F-35s: Drone Attacks and the Illogic of Gulf Procurement
David B. Roberts
June 1, 2026
One of the most effective counter-drone systems in the largest drone war in history between Ukraine and Russia is a German anti-aircraft gun designed during the Cold War. The Gepard — a self-propelled 35 mm cannon that first entered service in 1976 — has earned recognition from Ukrainian military experts as the most effective weapon against Shahed-type drones, at a cost of a few thousand dollars per engagement. Meanwhile, one of the more novel counter-drone technologies amounts to a sharpened prong mounted on another drone that lances its target mid-flight — a 12th-century solution to a 21st-century problem.
Then there is the 2026 Iran war, where the wealthiest states in the Middle East have spent tens of billions of dollars on layered Patriot, Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), and related architectures over the past decade but are running out of ammunition for those systems, fast. Iran’s missiles and drones have struck Gulf hotels, energy facilities, and billion-dollar military radars with frequency and persistence. Even though most Iranian missiles are intercepted, each successful interception burns through guided missiles at a rate the Western defense-industrial base cannot sustain indefinitely. The Center for International and Strategic Studies concluded that, while the picture of replenishment is challenging and often has long lead times, it is manageable for the United States, at least in this war. For the Gulf states, however, the picture is much more troubling, not least as “the U.S. and Israel will still need to first re-stock their own inventories.”
These air defense systems are technical miracles — they are literally shooting a bullet in the air with another bullet. But technical performance and strategic sustainability are not the same thing, and the Iran war is exposing this critical difference with brutal clarity. To answer these issues, the Gulf states need neither more F-15s, nor do they need to badger the United States for access to the F-35 – the latest high-tech export that promises to be all things to all people. Rather, they need a change of procurement mindset across the board, which would rest on three elements.
The first is local relevance: an architecture built around the threats Gulf states actually face, rather than those that animate American (and other supplier) force planning assumptions and that Gulf militaries have inherited largely intact. The second is logistical reali