Not a front line, but a death zone. What can be done with omnipotent FPV drones? - ВПК.name
AI Analysis
The article details the revolutionary impact of FPV (First-Person View) drones on the battlefield in Ukraine and Russia, highlighting their effectiveness as low-cost, highly lethal weapons. Notably, no effective counter-FPV technology currently exists, leading to the erosion of traditional front lines. The low cost and accessibility of FPV drone technology are fundamentally altering battlefield dynamics.
Key Takeaways
- FPV drones have become the dominant and deadliest weapon system in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
- The traditional concept of a 'front line' has been replaced by a continuous 'death zone' due to the pervasive threat of FPV drones.
- Despite the simplicity of FPV drone technology, effective countermeasures have not been developed in the past two years.
- FPV drones are functionally similar to older guided missiles (e.g., US SLAM missile) but are significantly smaller and cheaper.
- The cost to successfully hit a target with an FPV drone (~$1,000) is comparable to that of a single 155mm artillery shell.
Why It Matters
The proliferation of inexpensive, effective FPV drones represents a significant shift in modern warfare, challenging conventional air defense strategies and requiring a re-evaluation of force protection measures. The lack of effective countermeasures creates a vulnerability for all forces operating in environments where these drones are present, demanding urgent investment in counter-UAS technologies and tactics. This trend will likely continue and expand to other conflicts globally.
Not a front line, but a death zone. What can be done with omnipotent FPV drones? - ВПК.name In 2023, a revolution took place on the battlefield. Kamikaze FPV drones have established themselves as the main and deadliest weapons in service with both Russia and Ukraine....">
Войти
08.05.2026
Not a front line, but a death zone. What can be done with omnipotent FPV drones?
890
5
+1
Image source: Сергей Мирный/РИА Новости
No country in the world has yet been able to create a working protection against FPV drones.
In 2023, a revolution took place on the battlefield. Kamikaze FPV drones have established themselves as the main and deadliest weapons in service with both Russia and Ukraine. Their influence has become so strong that for the first time in a hundred years, the concept of a "front line" has disappeared, replaced by a solid gray death zone. Despite the extreme simplicity of this weapon, in two years there has been no decent protection from it. About how you can protect yourself from them, at least in theory, in the material of "Gazeta.Ru».
The Revolution
Like many other types of weapons, the FPV drone was not the fruit of one particular invention. A video camera, propellers, electric motors, autopilot, batteries — all this has existed since the second half of the 20th century. Moreover, both the USSR and the USA were armed with missiles and bombs, which can conceptually be called FPV.
For example, the American SLAM tactical missile of the 1990s works on the same principle: the image from its television camera is transmitted to the carrier aircraft, where the pilot manually indicates the target. In theory, if you describe an FPV drone to an engineer in the 1980s, he would be able to make its functional counterpart, but with two key differences — in size and cost.
| An engineer builds an FPV drone in Ukraine. | | --- | | Source: Evgeniy Maloletka/AP |
Drones in their modern form appeared in the course of miniaturization and cheapening of their components. Therefore, the drone is functionally similar to some old rockets, but it is launched by an infantryman with his hands and costs practically nothing. According to Western experts, the average cost of successfully hitting a target with an FPV drone is about $1,000, and this is taking into account unsuccessful attempts. For comparison, each unguided American 155-mm projectile costs about the same amount, and it usually takes much more than one to hit them.
This led to a paradoxical and unprecedented situation on the battlefield. Previously, in places where aviation reigned supreme and guided bombs were used, the enemy's infantry had only to hide in trenches, and the equipment had to hide under camouflage nets. Now, aircraft are not required to create a similar threat in the frontline.
Since drones are in service on both sides, the front line has disappeared as a clear boundary. Instead, the soldiers hide in the hearth shelters and try to survive, launch their drones and avoid b