Gauntlet Phase 1: America's New Champions of FPV Warfare - Inside Unmanned Systems
AI Analysis
The Pentagon's 'Drone Dominance Gauntlet' Phase 1 concluded with awards for up to 30,000 FPV drones to 11 primarily small and medium-sized defense contractors, signaling a shift towards rapid procurement of low-cost drone technology. A British-Ukrainian partnership achieved the highest score, surpassing established US firms like Neros and Napatree Technologies. The trials emphasized ease of use (2hr training) and adherence to NDAA regulations prohibiting Chinese components.
Key Takeaways
- Phase 1 of the Drone Dominance Gauntlet involved 26 companies competing to supply FPV drones.
- A British-Ukrainian partnership achieved the highest score in the competition.
- Neros and Napatree Technologies were the top-performing US companies.
- The evaluation criteria included open-field and urban strike capabilities, soldier-operator feedback, and production capacity.
- The Pentagon is prioritizing the development of a domestic FPV drone industry to avoid reliance on Chinese components, despite cost challenges.
Why It Matters
This initiative demonstrates a significant US military pivot towards embracing low-cost, expendable drones for tactical advantage, mirroring lessons learned from Ukraine. The focus on smaller companies suggests a willingness to bypass traditional defense procurement processes for faster innovation and deployment. The emphasis on ease of use indicates a desire to rapidly field these systems with minimal training requirements.
Gauntlet Phase 1: America's New Champions of FPV Warfare - Inside Unmanned Systems
From Garage Startups to Pentagon Champions: Meet the Eleven Companies Remaking American FPV Warfare
A Neros Archer small unmanned aircraft system flies toward a simulated target during a kinetic first-person view drone range on Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Zachariah Ferraro
Phase 1 of the Pentagon’s Drone Dominance Gauntlet saw 26 small and medium-sized defense contractors submit quadcopter drones for competitive trials at Fort Moore, Georgia, held from mid-February through early March. The top scorers were promised orders of up to 30,000 FPV drones between them — the first such buys intended to stimulate an indigenous U.S. industry and identify its most promising production partners.
Defense giants like Lockheed and Anduril were nowhere to be seen. For years America’s largest defense companies had struggled to approach the low costs of lethal FPV quadcopters mass-deployed on Ukraine’s battlefields — now the Pentagon wanted to see what the smaller players could do. The stumbling block remained familiar: UASs needed to adhere to NDAA regulations forbidding Chinese components, despite the tempting costs and deep inventory offered by the world’s largest small drone producer.
Early in March, the DDP posted a leaderboard scoring the 11 companies awarded production contracts. The results were startling: an obscure British-Ukrainian partnership held a commanding lead with a near-perfect score. Neros, already leading FPV adoption for the Army and Marine Corps, came in a strong second, followed by the little-known Napatree Technologies. The remainder hovered mostly at the lower end of passing, with six of the 11 scoring between 70 and 73.
The Phase 1 winners are a mixed and often obscure bunch — very young as a rule, with many fewer than three years old and only one founded before 2013. Some are squarely dedicated to FPV mass production; others style themselves primarily as software developers and R&D contractors. Some had never been publicly associated with FPV UASs before Gauntlet. Meanwhile, several well-known UAS builders that participated didn’t make the leaderboard at all.
The Marine Corps Attack Drone Team utilized the Neros Archer FPV drone to engage targets on the range to showcase the drone’s capabilities on the battlefield. U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Joshua Barker
Gauntlet Phase 1 Scoring
Submitted FPV systems were provided to military personnel with just two hours of training before they were asked to perform strikes against fixed targets in the open at up to 6.6 miles, or in a congested urban environment at up to 1.2 miles. DDP calculated a 0–100 score factoring in those two mission categories, soldier-operator evaluations, and estimated production capacity. A majority of participants also brought warhead-armed UAVs for an optional kinetic evaluation using vendor pilots.
Beside the main le