I Fought in Ukraine and Here's Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck
AI Analysis
The article discusses the limitations and challenges of first-person view (FPV) drones used in the Russo-Ukrainian War, highlighting their single-use nature and operational constraints. Despite their touted precision-strike capability, the author expresses skepticism about their revolutionary impact on warfare.
Key Takeaways
- FPV drones are used by Ukrainian forces for precision strikes but have limitations.
- These drones are often single-use and carry explosive charges up to 1.5 kilograms.
- FPV drones are controlled via virtual-reality goggles, offering a first-person view.
- There is debate about the actual impact of FPV drones on modern warfare tactics.
- New technologies like fiber-optic controlled drones are emerging in the conflict.
Why It Matters
The strategic significance lies in understanding the evolving role of drones in modern warfare, particularly in high-stakes conflicts like the Russo-Ukrainian War. The discussion around FPV drones highlights the need for continuous innovation and adaptation in drone technology to maintain tactical advantages on the battlefield.
I Fought in Ukraine and Here’s Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck -- -- --
When the world's at stake, go beyond the headlines.
National security. For insiders. By insiders.
National security. For insiders. By insiders.
Join War on the Rocks and gain access to content trusted by policymakers, military leaders, and strategic thinkers worldwide.
BECOME A MEMBER
BECOME A MEMBER
I Fought in Ukraine and Here’s Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck
Jakub Jajcay
June 26, 2025
Commentary
I Fought in Ukraine and Here’s Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck
Jakub Jajcay
June 26, 2025
In 2024 and 2025, I served for six months as an international volunteer on a first-person view attack drone team in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. My team was deployed in the Donbas region, in one of the hottest sectors of the front. When I joined the team, I was excited to work with a cutting-edge tool. By the end of my deployment, I was a bit disillusioned. Let me tell you why.
First-person view drones are unmanned aerial vehicles with four propellers located at the four corners of the craft, roughly in the shape of a square of seven to 12 inches in length on each side. They are controlled by an operator wearing virtual-reality goggles that receive the image from the drone’s forward-facing camera (hence the name first-person view). The most common types of first-person view drones are single-use: They fly directly into their target, where they detonate an explosive charge of up to 1.5 kilograms. These drones are touted as a cheap and accessible solution that can give troops on the tactical level their own organic precision-strike capability. They can supposedly react quickly and strike moving targets or targets in difficult-to-reach locations, such as bunkers, basements, or inside buildings. Proponents of first-person view drones often repeat the claim that as much as 60 to 70 percent of all battlefield casualties in the Russo-Ukrainian War are now caused by drones. This statistic is probably broadly accurate, though it does not differentiate between casualties caused by first-person view drones and other types of uncrewed aerial systems.
Some authors, including experienced military officers writing in these pages, go even further and claim that first-person view drones will precipitate a revolution in how wars are fought, akin to the introduction of muskets. Among other things, they will make concealment and the massi